HistoricBridges.org Menu: HistoricBridges.org Menu:


We Recommend These Resources:
Bach Steel - Experts at historic truss bridge restoration.

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Frasers Bridge

Frasers Bridge

Primary Photographer(s): Elaine Deutsch

Bridge Documented: 2008

View Photos
and Videos
View Maps
and Links

Key Facts

Facility Carried / Feature Intersected
Manor Road (PA-82) Over Indian Run
Location
Rural: Chester County, Pennsylvania: United States
Structure Type
Stone Segmental Deck Arch, Fixed
Construction Date and Builder / Engineer
1910 By Builder/Contractor: George Stine and Engineer/Design: Nathan R. Rambo

Technical Facts

Rehabilitation Date
Not Available or Not Applicable
Main Span Length
42 Feet (13 Meters)
Structure Length
20 Feet (6 Meters)
Roadway Width
20 Feet (6.1 Meters)
Spans
3 Main Span(s)
NBI Number
15008205522189

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

Bridge Documentation

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

This bridge is small, but has decent historic integrity and maintains an attractive appearance.

Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Historic Bridge Inventory

Discussion of Bridge

The 3-span stone arch bridge has a 20'-long centerspan and two flanking end spans of 10'- long each. The bridge has stone parapets with replacement concrete coping. The arch rings are ashlar sandstone. It is an example of a bridge type that is common from the first two decades of the 20th century in Chester County. The county-built traditional stone arch bridges were favored by the county engineer, and at least 19 similar bridges from 1908 to 1919 have been identified. Stone arch bridges have been in use in Pennsylvania since the late 17th century, and over 350 examples have been identified statewide, with more than twothirds dating to before 1900. Early 20th century examples in Chester County are considered individually significant in the local context only when they are complete and large or particularly well detailed. This example is not historically or technologically distinguished within its population or by its setting and context.

Discussion of Surrounding Area

The bridge carries a 2 lane road over a stream in a rural setting with scattered 20th-century residences. South of the bridge is an electric power transmission line, and beyond that a late-20th-century residence. At the northwest quadrant is the intersection with a local road. The northeastern quadrant is wooded. The setting does not have historic district potential.

Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: No

Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Stone Arch Bridge Management Plan

Discussion of Bridge

This bridge is not recommended for long-term preservation. It ranks just outside of the lowest third of all stone arch bridges under study in this plan, and the bridge has a very low waterway adequacy code. Waterway adequacy is a function of the size of the arch barrel, the main structural element of the bridge. Enlarging the waterway opening generally would require the construction of a new bridge. The condition code is moderate, a result of missing stones and some scour. Its transportation code is also moderate, bordering on low, a function of high traffic volumes and narrow width. The bridge is located in an area of low development potential, and should be able to carry its traffic into the future. The cost to rehabilitate the bridge is moderate, a function of missing stones. It is not listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually or as part of a historic district. This bridge has public support (one letter, six telephone calls, and one meeting at which this bridge was the focus). However, the inadequate waterway makes it difficult to recommend the bridge for long-term preservation.

Ratings

The West Brandywine, U.S. 30B/Indian Run Bridge is owned by PennDOT and is ranked 84th.
Condition Code = 48 - moderate
Transportation Code = 45 - moderate
Waterway Adequacy Code = 33 - very low
Cost to Rehabilitate or Replace Code = 52 - moderate
Anticipated Development Code = 58 - high
Recreational, Historical, and Cultural Values Code = 46 - moderate
Public Input Code = 54 - moderate

Recommendation: Not recommended for long-term preservation.

Divider

Photo Galleries and Videos: Frasers Bridge

 
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer
View Photo Gallery
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer

Divider

Maps and Links: Frasers Bridge

Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):

View Bridge Location In:

Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within a half mile of this bridge.

Bridgehunter.com: View listed bridges within 10 miles of this bridge.

Google Maps

Google Streetview (If Available)

Bing Maps

OpenStreetMap

Apple Maps (Via DuckDuckGo Search)

Apple Maps (Apple devices only)

MapQuest

HERE We Go Maps

ACME Mapper

Waze Map

Android: Open Location In Your Map or GPS App

Flickr Gallery (Find Nearby Photos)

Wikimedia Commons (Find Nearby Photos)

Directions Via Sygic For Android

Directions Via Sygic For iOS and Android Dolphin Browser

USGS National Map (United States Only)

Historical USGS Topo Maps (United States Only)

CalTopo Maps (United States Only)


Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About - Contact

© Copyright 2003-2020, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.

Divider