This bridge is an attractive example of a pin-connected through truss. A 1901 construction date is given, but the bridge has some odd details regarding the floor beam location above the bottom chord, and the bottom chord which slopes down in the end panels. It is not known who built the bridge. The portal bracing is similar to 1900s Massillon Bridge Company bridges, but the unusual bottom chord detail is not.
There is all mannner of construction going on around this area. It appears that this may have once been a pristine area of beautiful hills and forests, with this quant truss bridge nestled away among the winding roads of the area. However, today there is all sorts of industrial activity that appears to either be related to something like fracking or mining, or something of the sorts, and construction seems to be ongoing. A pungent natural gas style odor was around the area, and large underground ventilation equipment was visible near the bridge, as well as many pipelines. Large pickup trucks apparently related to all this were seen crossing this bridge. A worker was posted at the bridge to direct traffic. Given PennDOT's record for demolition of historic bridges, it would seem that a bridge in this setting doesn't stand a chance and likely awaits a fate similar to the natural beauty that once surrounded the bridge: It is likely this bridge will be replaced soon. This is unfortunate. The bridge would be an outstanding candidate for relocation and reuse on a non-motorized trail system.
Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Historic Bridge Inventory
Discussion of Bridge
The 5 panel, 104' long and 17' wide pin-connected Pratt thru truss bridge with the floorbeams placed above the lower chords is supported on ashlar abutments with wingwalls. The trusses are traditionally composed, and the floorbeams, which are connected with pin plates riveted to their outer edge, are built up. This is not a standard detail. The bridge dates to 1901, which is not early for a pin connected Pratt thru truss, but is a complete example with non-standard details, and it is among the oldest 10 examples in the district. It stands out in a county and region rich in truss bridges as a significant example of the important bridge type. The bridge is historically and technologically significant because of its completeness, relative rareness of the type, date of construction, and non-standard detailing.
Discussion of Surrounding Area
The bridge carries 1 lane of a state road over a stream in a sparsely developed, wooded setting on the Greene-Washington County line. A water filtration plant is beyond the southeast quadrant.
Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
CarCam: Southwestbound Crossing
Full Motion Video
|Note: The downloadable high quality version of this video (available on the video page) is well worth the download since it offers excellent 1080 HD detail and is vastly more impressive than the compressed streaming video. Streaming video of the bridge. Also includes a higher quality downloadable video for greater clarity or offline viewing.|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2021, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.