This bridge is a late example of a riveted truss bridge, having been built around less than ten years before rivets generally ceased to be used in new bridge construction. The bridge is however noteworthy as a rare (and visually pleasing) variety of continuous truss bridge, which features an arched design, where a deck truss approach transitions into a through truss for the central span. Unlike some examples of this bridge type, this one does not require a suspended deck.
The details of this bridge, particularly the portal bracing are similar to the Monaca - East Rochester Bridge. Based on the plan sheets for this bridge, it appears that with the Shippingport Bridge, the structure was designed by the state, but with some consulting engineering assistance from Michael Baker. Michael Baker also was a consulting engineer for the Monaca - East Rochester Bridge.
This bridge is located next to a nuclear power plant, and although the bridge has nothing to do with this and the bridge is on a public road, there are all sorts of threatening signs saying that parking, and even stopping on the bridge is forbidden. Locals indicated that anyone seen walking on the bridge and taking photos would likely receive an unwelcome visit from police in short order. It is sad that nobody can really enjoy this bridge just because it has the misfortune to be located in an area where constitutional freedoms come to a screeching halt. As a result, on-bridge photo documentation is limited for this bridge, although GoPro CarCam photos are available.
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
Search For Additional Bridge Listings:
© Copyright 2003-2022, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.