This bridge is the largest and most noteworthy of a few bridges that serve the road that was built to traverse the backwaters of the Mississippi River leading to the magnificent Back Hawk Bridge. The reason this 1956 continous deck truss is newer than the Lansing Bridge is because flooding destroyed many of the low bridges crossing the backwaters, while leaving the high level Black Hawk Bridge unharmed.
While a late example of a riveted truss bridge, this structure is noteworthy for its continuous design that is both attractive and complex. The structure is traditionally composed for its period.
The truss appears in excellent condition, while the concrete substructure shows areas of spalling. Corrective repairs should be taken to correct this spalling. The bridge features a concrete t-beam approach span at the eastern end of the bridge, which leads to a steel stringer span over railroad, which then leads to the three continuous spans, ending with a large steel stringer span at the western end.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery offers photos in the highest available resolution and file size in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Mobile Optimized Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. This gallery features data-friendly, fast-loading photos in a touch-friendly popup viewer. Alternatively, Browse Without Using Viewer|
Coordinates (Latitude, Longitude):
View Bridge Location In:
© Copyright 2003-2021, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.